N a p
a l
m H e
a l t
h S p
a : R
e p o
r t 2
0 0 9
JIM COHN
Interview with Jim Cohn by Randy Roark, February-March 2009
Randy Roark: Can you tell us a bit about what you consider to be your poetic
lineage?
Jim Cohn: I've always felt myself to be part of a cosmology of some kind or
another. As part of that it was evident early on that I wouldn't totally understand
what it and that it would offer little or no affirmation for my being a part of it.
Nevertheless, poetic lineage became a manifestation, a living mythos, for me.
Through circumstances beyond my control, I plugged into the poetry that
randomly came my way and the poetry that I purposefully sought out. I was
influenced by individual poets associated with the Beat Generation, not so much
from their books, but from knowing them at the height of their pedagogic powers
at the then newly founded Naropa Institute. By “teachers” I mean of poetry as a
practice in dharma. The transmitters that touched me most were Allen Ginsberg,
William Burroughs, Amiri Baraka, and the first generation Postbeat poets Ted
Berrigan, Alice Notley, Bernadette Mayer and Anne Waldman. I never met the
Persian-by-way-of-Canada American prose poet Jack Kerouac. In the process of
absorbing what was meaningful to me from many schools of poetry, and art in
general, I thought that the idea of "lineage" was interesting only as a kind of
bourgeois parlor game or a kind of intellectual cliche. I had read Norm
Chomsky’s ideas about transactional grammar while still in high school and went
on throughout my undergraduate years at the University of Colorado at Boulder to
receive training in critical analysis that succeeded in almost killing my passion for
literature. So, there's a vaudeville sense of lineage to contend with in my own
personal cosmos––either you have something to say that nobody is talking about
or you have something to say that everybody is talking about and can do that both
in a way that resonates with the past and the future or it doesn’t. And you have
moments of lucidity and moments of utter darkness––a series of dreams and
nightmares––maybe one dream about Crazy Horse riding through a hail of bullets
and two nightmares about the people that broke your heart and the suffering you
cannot escape. In my library I have the works of a few of my contemporaries:
people like Basho, Antler, Thoreau, Eileen Myles, Robert Desnos, Mary Shelley,
Andy Clausen, Wanda Coleman, Federico Garcia Lorca, Else von Freytag-
Loringhoven, Paul Blackburn, Thomas R. Peters, Jr., Mina Loy, John Cage, Maria
Tsvetaeva, Nanao Sakaki, the Baal Shem Tov, Joanne Kyger, Bob Kaufman,
Gertrude Stein, Hunter S. Thompson, Wang Wei, bell hooks, Marc Olmsted,
Abraham Lincoln, Shakespeare, videos by the American Sign Language poet
Peter Cook, Han Shan, David Cope. I don't belong to any lineage and I don't think
any lineage belongs to me. You can’t exactly audition. Still, in Valparaiso, Chile,
seeing the large photograph of Whitman in the Chilean poet Neruda's study I had
an out-of-body experience. I should say my sense of lineage does not go in only
one direction. That is, I sense that I'm as much a part of the invisible lineages of
the future if not more than I am those of the past. I remember the future.
RR: Can you remember when you first became aware of poetry? Can you
remember the first poem you wrote and why?
JC: Poetry came first through mass media, mass entertainment––
Faster than a speeding bullet...
More powerful than a locomotive...
Able to leap tall buildings at a single bound...
Crazy metaphoric autochthonic language like that from TV shows and Sunday
matinees made language something to attend to, something of interest. After all,
early cognition is all a poem. The first book I read where I got the idea of the
excitement of reading was Howard Pyle’s The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood. I
remember finding it on the library shelves in my elementary school and reading it
until I fell asleep for about a month. The first poem that I wrote that made me feel
like I was connecting with the big time poets was "George Washington Bridge,
Lower Level, Clear Day." GWB was something I'd written while living at
Birdsfoot Farm, an organic farming commune in St. Lawrence County. I wrote
that piece in January 1989, when I was thirty-five years old. The poem came in a
flash as I drove across the bridge carrying a truckload of firewood into Manhattan
on a beautiful winter's day. I wrote it in a cabin with no ninety degree walls, a
woodburning stove for heat, no running water, on a Royal manual typewriter with
correcto-tape. Although I had been writing poems since my days as a student at
Naropa, lots of them, this poem convinced me that I was a poet when there was
nobody around to affirm or deny that for me:
GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE, LOWER LEVEL, CLEAR DAY
Who
would want to take
the
lower level of the
GW on a crystal clear
day? If
I put a fake
ice cube with a cock-
roach
in their drink
Would
they say any-
thing
about it to me?
Would they feel a need
to
discuss their right
to choose when faced
with
duality? Would their
license plate have sig-
nificance?
Would the letters
&
numbers undulate like
a snake
down the arm of
the Statue of Liberty
at
Equinox? Do they like
Jackie Gleason more than
Pee Wee
Herman? Have they
written books in Arabic
denouncing
Mickey Mouse?
Do they own a string of
zipper
factories? Do they
wash each blade of grass
in
their yard with a damp
cloth? Do they have dreams
of
their parents killing each
other? Are they afraid to
have
children? Have they
ever fallen thru ice?
Been
stuck in an electric
car between terminals at
the
airport in Houston?
Were they children who
had run
hotels in Mexico?
Were they child assassins
in Pol
Pot's army? Are they
a child with memories of
helicopters
exploding stuffed
inside the body-bag of an
adult
driving over the Hudson
River, clear day, on the
George
Washington Bridge.
Just someone
looking for
a place
to rent. Just some-
one on the way to a nursery
to
water geraniums &
Easter lilies. Just
someone
who uses a Spell
Check. An Image scientist.
just someone doing a little
Inside trade. Had they seen
Yellowstone
burn? Did they
carry a pair of Chicago
roller
skates in the trunk?
Are
there used condoms
in
their ashtray? Does
their left rear tire
need a
little air? Have
they been to the Panama
Canal?
Do they horde toilet
paper in their basement?
Do they
sleep with their
students? Had they been
ordered
to kill their teacher?
Were there baby shoes
hanging
from the rear-view
mirror? How old is their
hairdo?
How long are they
planning to wear those
socks?
Do they keep the
Christmas lights on their
house
up all year? Do they
pray to St. Anthony when
they've
lost something &
then find it! Are their
headlights
on? Do they think
golf would be more inter-
esting
if the fairways were
different colors? Do they
believe in Pro Wrestling?
Would they rather see
Llamas
than dogs in the subway?
Is
it someone related to
George
Washington himself!
Could it be! Is it someone
who
thinks the Tooth
Fairy real? A
policy
strategist?
A media wizard?
Maybe you grow ginseng root.
You
were the Emperor's Physician.
A Department
of Corrections
officer.
A security guard. Just
someone who lives the
house
they were born in. The
Mayor--—putting homeless
people
in a cheap hotel.
Was
that a Laundry Worker
on
strike driving down onto
the Lower Level? A painter
who saw
only Anti-Space? Someone
good with structure? Someone
who
didn't need any.
Were they eating Melba
Toast?
Do they know UPS
leases ships to the Navy?
When
they shit, do they "Shit
from the heart?" Do they
think
water-polo is played with
rackets?
Had they learned to react
calmly
to the death of strangers?
Do
their windshield wipers
work?
Do they consider the Cross-
Bronx Expressway "The Drop
Ceiling
of Hell?" Are all
their brothers
cops? Did
they
know Mingus? Do they
live in an apartment full
of
writers? When the President
left Washington, did they snap
off a
parting salute? Just somebody
behind the wheel, thinking it's
better
to live our lives than
put a price upon them. Just
composing
Verse—as in Universe.
As in the Future going on
foot
thru a Crowd. Had their
fathers died of nightmares?
Do
their sisters have exaggerated
& self-conscious
attachments
to the
Great Blank Spaces of
American Culture that seem to
reduce
them to a tiny yet inextinguish-
able song? Is their greatest
vanity
Hairdressing
the Hero? Do they see
the bridge as a Rainbow? Do
they
think
of rainbows as the Ever-Present
Unity Connecting Two Camps? Are
they
72-Hour-Awake-Truckdrivers on
Speed listening to Emmylou Harris
CDs?
Does the Bridge remind them of
George Washington, cutting down
the
cherry
tree? Mother, I cannot tell
a lie. I cut down the Sacred
Hoop
today.
I cut down the great Tree
of Peace today Mother. Are they
en route to a Ta'i Chi Ballroom
for an evening of Slam
Waltzing?
Is this
Noise that I hear pieces of
Silence breaking off from the
enormous
& dumb & incorrigible
mass inside them? Do they
shriek
&
squeal—those Tires—or is
that Sound the pressing of human
Energy
& Existence upon us, without
there ever being a taking
account
of the
Destruction? Do the poets
of the Poolhalls dream blue
pizzas
thinking of Rilke in Munich
bleeding like the Sun to say
"It
lies in
the nature of every finally
perfect love that sooner or
later
it may
no longer reach the loved one
save in the Infinite." Do
they
take
this Lower Level for to glimpse
Swans below? Are their Hearts
as
tender
as the inside of red roses?
Let me tell you why I like that number. It impressed me. The idea of it came all
at once and with it the assignment to write it. And then I did it. In doing it, I found
it contained energy that was my energy and vision that was my vision. It was my
construction and it was my own counterbalance to various other ephemera. And it
was also a product of my own ephemera. Other poets one admires for the miracle
of how they get the language to do things that can liberate your mind. If you
cannot admire yourself for the miracle of how you get things across in your own
language, you should read about the life of Christine de Pizan or watch something
like Jet Li in Twin Warriors. "George Washington Bridge" is not a difficult object
to comprehend and I liked that very much. Still, nobody much noticed. I might as
well as written it with invisible ink. But I did it because I had to. It was a 40-
degree below freezing. Northern lights all green in the sky and there I was,
writing by kerosene lantern light. Other poets far better known than I ever care to
be probably aren’t the wood shed type. I had different ambitions. I wanted to let
the people of the future know that I had been to my own mountaintop, which in
that case, was the lower level of the George Washington Bridge. So, I see
cultivated in this early poem a sense of fearlessness and fleetingness. I think the
poem stands today as a clear expression of certain laws of culture and the
incessant movement around those laws just by giving voice to my own ragged
thought forms one night while removed in a little wooden hut with nothing to do
but watch the snow blow in under the door.
RR: How did you become a piano tuner? Whose pianos have you tuned?
JC: I had a serious jones for the piano since I was a kid. We had a blind piano
tuner come work on the family piano, a Steinway console. I have that piano
today. I was enamored with players from Otis Spann to Thelonius Monk, Art
Tatum to Professor Longhair, Nicky Hopkins to Keith Godchaux. When I
graduated from college in 1976, I made the decision to go to a piano tuning and
rebuilding school––The Simms School of Piano Technology. James Simms was
the proprietor. He drove a Cadillac and had thick oily black hair. The Simms
School of Piano Technology was an interesting scene with a lot of southern
intrigue on the banks of the Chattahoochee River. Work gangs in black and white
striped prison clothes cleaned up the park in front of the nearby Piggly Wiggly
chained to each other at the ankles. The Tastee Freeze girl was blackmailing one
of the Simms’ students, accusing him of getting her pregnant. The owner had a
few of his own less than discreet trysts. The technical trainers would bring us
beefsteak tomatoes and we would eat them over by the loading dock. I was there
six months. I must have listened to Neil Young’s Tonight's the Night a thousand
times while living in Columbus, Georgia. I lived next door to a single woman
commandeering a family of five kids. On the road opposite us was a Fort
Bennington bombing range. I used to take long walks there. One night my house
burned down. I’d started a fire and gotten into the shower to warm up when I saw
flames shooting through the walls. I attended Simms's school regularly, learned
how to set a proper equal tempered scale by ear, run beats, clear the octaves,
rebuild and regulate an action, restring and hammer, drill a new pinblock, shim a
Eastern White Spruce soundboard. I opened my first piano rebuilding shop in
Glen Elen, California, near Jack London Park where Jack London’s dream house
burned in 1913. I think I read Martin Eden in Glen Elen. Jack London had some
pretty strange views on life, but that book was good advice for not getting too
disheartened if the world did not stand up on its hind legs and throw you a bag of
loot for your troubles. I had a few accounts going. My friend and musical
collaborator, Mark “Mooka” Rennick, had moved out to Cotati and was about to
start what would become his Prairie Sun Recordings. I moved my shop out of
Glen Elen and into a single room on Madrone Avenue, just of Highway 116 near
one of the best Sonoma County dives around, Red’s Recovery Room. I did a lot
of thinking in that shop and some work when I could get it. I began to apprentice
with the Grateful Dead's keyboard tech down in Marin County. His name was
Robert Yambert. I'd stay overnight at Robert’s little compound in Lagunitas.
Later, after Mooka establish Prairie Sun Recordings and I had packed up my tools
and moved to Montana, Tom Waits recorded his two Grammies by using the
room that'd been my piano repair shop and I think there was a movie made there
in that room as well. I then opened a third shop in Missoula. That was in the fall
on 1979. The winter I lived there my water pipes froze. The sink fell off the wall.
I wrote a letter to Allen Ginsberg at Naropa explaining why, for some reason, I
thought I would make a good teaching assistant. I think you were the person that
encouraged me to do it. I’d been working on the railroad all that fall before
moving to Missoula, trying to make enough money to enroll in Naropa. In 1980 I
became Allen’s teaching assistant at the Kerouac School. That winter Allen
secured a piano in his apartment at 2141 Bluff Street in Boulder. It was a large
yellow upright. It was in pretty bad shape. He asked me to tune it. When I
finished Gregory Corso came into the living room very quiet and respectful.
When I was done he sat down and played Cole Porter's "Begin the Beguine."
After he finished playing he just sits there for a while, a long while really, and
then he gets up and he gives me a kiss on the cheek. Once I borrowed the traps
from the square grand piano in the lobby of a hotel in the center of Boulder in
broad daylight. I needed to duplicate the design for a job. After I did that I had to
replace them in the middle of the hotel lobby right in the open again. Nobody
seemed to notice one way or another.
RR: I've seen you play the guitar many times but I can only remember seeing you
play the piano once. There is some piano on your CDs, but it's mostly guitar
music. Do you have a piano in your house now? Do you mostly compose on the
piano or the guitar? Do you find your write different kinds of music on each?
JC: Instruments are like fortune tellers. You go to them for alchemical purposes. I
had a singer songwriter phase as a younger man and I'm studying that archive
now, but I moved into something else after my first solo record, Unspoken Words,
and began a whole new process, something that feels more appropriate for the feel
and the sound I’m after. Unspoken Words was a transitional phase from the
songwriter I’d been to the spoken word poet I had become. There were songs like
I had written early on such as "Rewrote The Book" and "Palm Reader" but there
were also experimental things in which I was putting my poems to the musical
soundtrack in my head such as "When Robots Cry" and "Meditation At A
Stoplight In The Rain" which were improvisational. Rhyme just doesn't get me far
enough to anything that touches me. I needed to yield to other forces than myself
musically. Say what you will about musicians, the ones worth any salt are able to
listen, especially when there's tape running. I'd stopped feeling that about the
people who came to my poetry readings. I might as well have been talking to
myself. I recently remixed about two hours of selected material I've recorded
between 1995 and 2008 into a two CD compilation called Impermanence. You
can hear an example of my keyboard playing on “Ghost Dance” and my guitar
playing on “Rewrote The Book.” "Ghost Dance" is an intense little something I
wrote a day or two after the fall of the World Trade Center Towers which Bob
Holman published at his aboutpoetry.com website. It begins with the historic
literal Ghost Dance Chant contributed by David Young and I did the organ work
on that. “Rewrote The Book” is a song that came to me all at once. The opening
lines––“You went into a trance to live. / Chose a one room flat when you had a
mansion.”––came to me one day out of nowhere and the song just rolled itself off
the line in nothing flat. Thanks to my friendship with Mooka, I've recorded with
some pretty fascinating characters: guitarist Steve Kimock on "Padre Trail,"
Arabaic surf music king Dick Dale on "Years Of The Light Highway" and
keyboardist John Alaire on "Undivided Attention." Mooka has carried me over
the years like Leonard Chess did Muddy Waters. In my own solo recording
career, I have had some interesting chapters. I played with Allen's musical
collaborator, Steven Taylor, on a punk version of Tom Campion's "Follow Thy
Faire Sun Unhappy Shadow." The only other cover I've ever done is that greatest
personal ad of all time, "My Funny Valentine," which I embedded in the middle
of a thing called "Odessa (The Mime)." With Boulder keyboardist and arranger
Bob Schlesinger we did a 40 minute improve to a long poem of mine "Treasures
For Heaven." That piece sort of fulfilled an ambition begun when as a teenager I
first heard The Doors “The End.” The piece "Dragon Tracks" was composed live
with an all-girls band and that had a feel unlike anything in my repertoire. The
success of that session made me wonder why there are no terrific girl jam bands
with huge cult-like followings. Is it that girls don’t like to jam? Isn’t the world
ready for that yet? Do you have to be Iranian? One of the greatest sessions I ever
had was for a piece called "Where The Road Disappears" because that night was
nearly cancelled when the guitar player showed up without his guitar. Joey the
guitar player had no money for strings. Another time the session players got stuck
in a blizzard and couldn’t make it. I’d invited a friend, Michael Matheny, over
that night and Michael stopped by with his guitar. On the spot we did “Because,”
this little poem I’d written for my daughter. There are very few social situations
where the mood makes any sense to my nervous system. I need to insert myself
where forces can be engaged, to paraphrase Trungpa Rinpoche, in a First Take
Best Take manner. On the other hand, sometimes I would be hearing something in
the session only later and I'd add it myself instrumentally after everybody left.
The way I create my vocals can also involve a totally opposite process than the
speed of the actual session work, but I’m after a very elusive thing––a kind of
Prajna Paramita oral hat trick of form and emptiness. It sometimes takes a while
to feel what had happened so quickly instrumentally and to find a way to phrase
what I had said that was a particular poem in an instrumental space that arose
without thought. Ultimately, for me, music is space. Not the space of a canvas,
but more like the space in Stan Brakhage's Dog Star Man. So, I do write
differently on different instruments, but my primary instrument is my heart as
seen through my mind in a kind of vivid soundtrack of and to the moment I wrote
the poem.
RR: What is your vision for the Museum of American Poetics?
JC: The initial image of the Museum of American Poetics (MAP) early on was
that of a literary center. Its mission was codified by Boulder poet Tom Peters,
Thomas R. Peters, Jr., owner of the Beat Book Shop and long running master of
ceremonies for the "So, You're A Poet!" reading series. Alluding to a line by the
New York School poet John Ashbery, Tom gave MAP it's credo: "The poetry of
the future is opening its doors." So there was an open-ended quality to my initial
vision of the Museum of American Poetics. It was part Corn Palace, part roadside
attraction, but I also had intentions to make it in and of itself not only of and about
great art, but great art itself. My vision of MAP has changed over the years. It
began with a dream the night Allen Ginsberg died that the literary works of the
Beat Generation would be forgotten. I don't now think that will happen any time
soon, but it drove me into a preservationist state of mind. After about the first 5
years things got a little more expansive and I began documenting and curating
more and more poet web pages and creating exhibits reflecting the diversity of
American Poesy. Things started happening as I was fortunate to work with a
series of webmasters as out of their gourds as myself. The experimentation with
design and iconicity and arrangement on the front side, not to mention the behind
the curtain organization out back, began to give the Museum of American Poetics
an aura that we were seriously engaging both the medium and the message.
Around MAP's first decade online, I began to critically explore the relationship
between the Beat and the Postbeat because that was my experience and I wasn't
seeing it reflected anywhere else. There are many roads leading beyond the Beat
Generation, but none of them was the road I was on. There were a couple
anthologies that came close to bringing together the Postbeats, but no coherent
theory about them. In that way, I’m like Stephen Hawkins. I may not be able to
explain the nature of black holes, but I’m after a unifying theory. These people
that put together these collections didn’t seem to have any ability to describe what
was right before their eyes. I saw myself and others that had known and worked
and traveled with Allen and been directly influenced by him faced with the reality
that no one was interested in because no one was being told they should be and
really we were quite fortunate that they weren’t. For me, I just got to a point
where I needed to restructure MAP as a sanctum sanctorum, a holy of holies, an
inspiration to those that write and those that depend on the what poets do. As for
the Postbeats––I was very interested in knowing who they were because really in
the aftermath of the Beat Generation, they were everywhere. So, MAP's first
decade curatorial period is marked with an effort to establish lines of Postbeat
poets. There was a certain art to doing that. Around 2008 I began to feel both
restricted and somewhat shallow for the "American" part of the name of the
enterprise. I began a series of new exhibits to push beyond borders, both in time
and space. I wanted any poet anywhere that may access MAP's pages to know that
it may not be about us, but those to come shall compose even greater works of art.
This probably caught the attention of places like the Library of Congress, the
Academy of American Poets, The Electronic Poetry Center, and the Allen
Ginsberg Trust and who knows what nefarious other dark forces. I don't know
what Enheduanna, Homer, Sappho, Ovid, Lalya al-Akhyaliyyah, Li Bai, Lady Ise,
Milarepa, Rumi, Dogen and Petrarch, Villon and du Bellay, John Donne,
Geronimo and Black Elk would be into today, but it’s what I got into. Working
long term on a website is it's own form of looking into the mirror. You can want
from it more or less, but you still end up with nothing.
RR: I'm curious about how your work with disability services, and specifically
your experience with American Sign Language has affected you as a poet.
JC: Right Livelihood has to link to one's sense of calling, what you came to this
life to do. It also involves making of yourself a path of service to align who you
are and the human condition. I have been graced with many lives, but the one
associated with American Sign Language (ASL) poetics and the one consumed by
disability services left their own particular imprints on me as a poet. My interest
in ASL poetics began with Allen, but it was equally influenced by the
ethnographic writings of Gary Snyder, particularly the book Earth Household. In
2008, the filmmaker Miriam Nathan Lerner completed an extensive documentary,
two years in the making, on the 20th century history of ASL poetry. The film is
titled The Heart of the Hydrogen Jukebox after “Howl.” I was quite surprised to
see myself honored for the role I played in introducing Ginsberg to a deaf
audience of poets in 1984 and in coordinating the first national Deaf poetry
conference in 1987 because the last major contact I had with a Deaf literary arts
audience, around 1990 was a debacle. I was literally booed off stage. Deaf people
do not want to have a hearing person anywhere near something as revered to them
as their language. I didn’t blame them. The experience was instrumental in my
moving forward. Accolades aside, what affected me most during the period of my
Deaf cultural immersion was my primary informant, Robert Panara, the single-
most learned Deaf poet-scholar of the 20th century. I did a lot of coordinating of
bicultural and bilingual poetry readings between 1984 and 1987 in Rochester. I
was guided by an invisible hand that whole time and the poets I met were equally
guided by their own fates. I met a young poet during that time named Peter Cook
who went on to revolutionize poetic signing in a way that just blew everyone who
saw him perform, hearing or deaf, away. We became quite good friends. Peter
collaborated with spoken word artist Kenny Lerner and together they formed a
performance poetry show called the Flying Words Project that has toured the
world. A biography of those guys would be pretty shocking. They were as
paradigm shifting as Chuck Berry and Boris Karloff. There’s a lot of superstition,
since Beethoven, about Ninth Symphonies, because people would die trying to
finish them. Flying Words Project began with that and took off from there. I was
married to a woman named Donna Kachites at the time, a gifted sign language
interpreter. Donna interpreted for a deaf poet named Debbie Rennie, who's poetry
took off where Dorothy Miles, perhaps the most empassioned Deaf poetess of the
20th century, left off. With Rochester poet and painter J. Todd Beers, I did a
reading series at a club called Jazzberries that featured poets such as Bernadette
Mayer, Andy Clausen, and Antler. Everyone was interpreted, either with voicing
or signing. Allen had articulated that phanopoeia, the image aspect of poetry, was
the only thing he found that would translate into other languages. Wit or lyricism
would not. It was Allen who told the ASL poets in Rochester that the visual
aspect of ASL could make the Deaf poet quite relevant to any global poetry. I did
come away from it with a more immediate understanding of the nature of the
signing space. I took the Pound-Fenollosa model of the Chinese written character
as a medium for poetry and transposed that theory to ASL. So, a lot of reading
and talking at Naropa found an interesting application with ASL that fueled my
own willingness to ransom myself to the skillfulness poetry requires. The
skillfulness poetry requires is to see your self as completely out-to-lunch and also
to develop a total fondness for that. That's Right Livelihood. I didn't have to take
anything because it was all right there given to me. I'm speaking of the rapture of
all night talking in silence, the feeling that I was being transported. My mouth
transposed to my hands and ears transposed to my eyes. It could get quite surreal
and I wrote about it in my first
book of prose essay, Sign Mind: Studies
in
American Sign Language Poetics. I found in ASL a complimentary prosody to
English, but with distinct parameters from the oral language tradition and older,
more embodied with vividness than words, more of The Origins. From 1988 to
1992 I opened and ran a disability services office at St. Lawrence University in
Canton, NY. One of my friends on the faculty of SLU was Thomas Coburn who
taught in Religious Studies. Later, Tom would take a stab at being president of
Naropa University. I went on to develop an intense personal interest in combining
the fields of Disability Studies and Disability Services while working at the
University of Colorado at Boulder, which I did full time from 1997 to 2009. That
interest put me at odds with the Disability Studies community who saw service
providers as necessary evils. Who can blame them, I suppose. I was heavily
influenced by my second wife, a student of the Connecticut American Buddhist
teacher and scholar, Reginald Ray. A gifted Chinese herbal healer and
acupuncturist in her own right, Susannah Carleton turned me on to a book called
Masters
of Mahamudra: Songs and Histories of the
Eighty-four Buddhist
Siddhas by Keith Dowman. That book, about the lives of the siddhas, more than
any other source, gave me insight into working with people with disabilities that I
practiced for nearly two decades, including a long run at the University of
Colorado at Boulder’s Disability Services unit. It was the way Buddhist
psychology approaches the human condition that I found so useful in my own life
and in my relationships with people with disabilities that led me in 2003 to write a
book called The Golden Body: Meditations on the Essence of Disability. Beyond
the desire to mark or stereotype or produce composites of beauty and giftedness
or anomaly and deficit based on the creation of an superior-inferior polarity, I
came to the awareness that the essential nature of all beings lies within a higher
norm. The yearning for this awareness was reinforced daily and took my poetry to
places I don’t think it would have gone if I had taken a different direction.
RR: I know you became a father for the first time at the age of 50. I’ve known
one of my best friends—Zoe—since she was three and she’s about your
daughter’s age. We play a lot of games and I’ve watched her learn how to reason,
and now she’s old enough to read, so as we walk down the street she reads all the
signs in the windows and bumper stickers on passing cars. Watching her grow in
this way has been a very powerful experience to me. Are you aware of any ways
that raising a child has affected your writing or your writing practice?
JC: Bringing up my daughter adds another kind of intention to my own writing
practice. She at least quadruples it. When I was a student at Naropa we would be
assigned walking poems, walking meditation poems. Notice everything. Notice
what you notice. My daughter is an Aries and I am an Aries and my mother was
an Aries and her mother was an Aries. Aries have a fucking impossible time with
it all. We are a very energetic people, very loving, very independent,
revolutionary, creative people, very emotional, very alone. I feel bookended by
my mother on one side, behind, and my daughter on the other side, ahead, and the
three of us together. My mother always told me that she gained great inner
strength from her children when she struck out as a single parent. I feel that as
well, raising my daughter on my own. Many times I wish I could call my mother,
who is dead. We may be lying in
bed, as we were last night, reading Oh,
The
Places You’ll Go, a book-length poem by Dr. Seuss, a very heavy poem, a Beat
homage of sorts, a paean to Allen in a way, very surprising actually, and I’ll hear
my voice saying the words “Wherever you fly, you’ll be best of the
best./Wherever you go you will top all the rest./Except when you don’t./Because,
sometimes, you won’t.” I’ll be thinking between the words, between the sounds
the words are making as I hear what they say, about how that went for me when I
was a child at her age and how that went for me till I got to where I am now, and
how here we are and how she’s hearing it, like it’s some kind of admonition, a
wise admonition, and a strikingly well executed verse and a very adult message to
be laying on a child and we’ll just keep on reading it through the darkness around
us and in the pictures and in there I’ll be wondering about Dr. Seuss’s intention
too, and how the drawings of the abyss he drew don’t quite register for a child as
an abyss at all, as suffering, as despair, as depression. They just register like a
funny looking cake or something. I’ll think about teaching a child about ego, as
Allen once told me, how it’s something to proclaim and renounce. And I’ll begin
to wonder why my daughter chose me as her parent and why she chose to return
to this world when she did and who she was before and what she’s come here to
do. And then I’ll look over at her in my other arm, the one not holding the book,
and I’ll see she has fallen asleep and I’ve been having all these thoughts reading a
children’s story to myself. Having a child might have influenced my writing, but
the current state of civilization had ruptured my poetry pretty thoroughly even
before she came into my life. Nothing my teachers had written seemed close to
the kind of world that virtuality was creating. Maybe Kerouac’s Dr. Sax. Maybe
some of Burroughs. For all I know, my daughter will have a brain implant––
something you can buy at Target or Best Buy, something right out of The Matrix.
Her cognition may be enhanced by uploading as well as her crystallized
knowledge. I mean, she may think nothing of internal operating systems
hybridizing her existence. She was not even a year and a half when I wrote “Notes
To A Young P-borg” in my book Quien Sabe Mountain. That was a poem I wrote
not so much for her, but for poet-cyborgs of the future to take in their flash drives
to read upon the junkyard ruins when their hardware goes bad. I did write a book-
length poem to her––The Ongoing Saga I Told My Daughter. That book describes
everything I felt as a father, all the joy of it, and more. Some people aspire to
leave a zero-carbon footprint. Knowing that I probably won’t be around to see
many if not all of the milestones of my daughter’s adulthood, I wrote Saga as a
kind of zero-regret footprint model for and to her because that’s really the
message I got from everything growing up in the family I came from. My
mother’s father, Isadore Lewis, was one of thirteen children. He loved cash and he
loved food. Nobody in the Lewis family knows where they came from. They were
gypsy peddlers somewhere in Eastern Europe. It was such a miserable existence,
nobody wanted to remember. My own father, Jimmy Heimann, vanished when I
was young. He adhered to a perverse interpretation of patriarchy, the kind where
you expect your woman and children to put up with anything. He didn’t get
kicked out of the armed services like Arlo Guthrie portrayed in Alice’s
Restaurant.” He was dropped for
disorderly conduct; a supercilious attitude
compounded by a lack of originality. My paternal grandfather, Emanuel, was a
painter and his wife, Cora, my father’s mother, was a poet. Everything was God’s
will to her. They lived in a building on Lake Shore Drive without a thirteenth
floor. The elevator went from twelve to fourteen as if bad luck could be done
away with just like that. I was adopted by a kohanim or cohanim, a direct male
descendant of the Biblical Aaron, brother of Moses, the Kohan Godal or high
priest––Marvin M. Cohn, a gentle, spiritual Jew who celebrated the Jewish
Shabbat every Friday night. A diabetic from the age of twelve, who died in 1972
when his ambulance ran out of gas in a below zero Cleveland night en route to the
hospital after a heart attack at home, he was related to my birth father’s family.
His two daughters were distant cousins. His death left my step-sisters in the
unenviable position of having lost their own mother to polio, a likeable step-
mother to divorce, and then their father to someone that couldn’t read a gas gauge.
They were like orphans in my mother’s house. Even if their second step-parent
had been Teresa of Avila, they were already so through the mill with the
powerlessness and hopelessness who could blame them for how they felt about
anything. My mother, Lois Lewis, skipped two grades and graduated high school
at sixteen. She died when my daughter was only three. The poet Lew Welch said
you have to know your tribe and you have to know how your mother speaks. I
recognized my own mother’s loneliness from the constant entertaining she did
and by her marrying men for reasons that went clearly outside the romantic.
Scholarship and education are in my blood, but not exactly academic scholarship
or academic learning. My mother would dress up in her nightgown every year for
the Oscars and put on a tiara and sit at the edge of her bed––she was from that
American female generation where the silver screen was the key to learning how
to adapt one’s femininity to male power and subvert it. I respected that in her
from an early age and am the result of her intermingling of male and female
energies in some fashion. Her energy was somewhat grotesque to me as a child
and yet totally reasonable. For me, my mother was very much a prototype, a
living proof, of the feminist writings Anne Waldman would produce decades
later. She had the discipline and the willfulness to succeed in a man’s world. I
probably channel that in Saga as an invocation to my daughter’s guides and
guardian angels, including her grandmothers who both left her early. And as a
kind of cautionary tale against viewing people as consumer products, acquisitions,
regardless of their gender(s), as she will be led to believe. There’s a kind of
softness to that poem, even though it is extremely hard-edged in parts, that I had
not found words for until I wrote it. It’s probably the only time I openly share my
feminine side so completely in my work. You can feel it. I didn’t do that because I
had some vague notion or desire to live vicariously or even numenally through
my daughter––have her be the person I could not be. She is her own person with
her own karma. I understand that much. I mean, being a parent is a nonstop poetry
reading tour. Sometimes your audience is wrapped with attention, sometimes
there’s utter disinterest and other times they’re throwing bottles like you were
working behind chicken wire at Bob’s Country Bunker. Every day affects
everything you’ve written––the dynamics, the flow, the rhythm, the music. The
single father-daughter thing is pretzels turned to flutes in a kind of Pippi
Longstocking surrealism. Until my daughter Isabella Grace was born, I was like
that Steve Martin character in Father of the Bride Part II. I was a poet, but my life
was just one massive emotional cave-in after another that I kept exploring deeper,
sometimes squeezing through insanely narrow cracks, sometimes crawling
headfirst at indecipherable angles only to have to crawl backwards out of the dead
ends, sometimes discovering vast underground rooms. I could knock myself out
trying to show my daughter Little Walter or Istanbul only to discover that what
really turned her on was the night we spent a snowstorm stranded at a hotel and
the power went off and left us in complete utter darkness on the bed. That was far
out to her. I wanted to leave her a place where she could return to as she grew up,
where she could find solace, if she ever needed that, from me. I just wanted to
leave her with something of my consciousness.
RR: What do you believe poetry's place is
in the current culture?
JC:
William Carlos Williams, in his book The
Embodiment of Knowledge, wrote
that
poetry is the Skeleton pointing out again and again to Intelligence the
“special
plea” of sentience––“the attacks upon it and their unreasonableness,”
including
the drawing of “false conclusions… of that general
nature” This was
and is
still very much poetry’s place in the current culture. For me, poetry is a
manifestation
that there is no authority other than one’s self. This is not to say that
there is
a “self” or that there is an “authority” or that one’s self or one’s authority
is
greater or lesser than anyone else’s self or authority or that either your self
or
your
authority is not ruled by the same falsities as those selves or authorities
that
wish to
silence you or that you wish to silence or that anything created as “poetry”
in this
current culture is interesting as poetry to any other self or authority in this
or any current
culture. You may be able to interface your breakthrough internet
multimedia
device to your online social networking web pages and we may be
able to
instantaneously view and hear your latest intellectual property production
with
gapless playback, but will that be a place for poetry in any formulation of
“current
culture?” You may be highly organized, highly efficient in the craft and
tools of
your times. You may be a spiritual or
political leader––with many people
willing
to follow you to the ends of the earth.
You may be a young idol, fully
engaged
in popular art or low art burlesque, with the adoration of millions from
around
the globe. You may be a magician of chaos, always one step beyond the
law and
the censors, able to create sensational spectacles, challenging
governments,
uncovering infinite incompetencies in managing responses,
bringing
forth a full accounting. You may have founded a new criticism or healed
yourself
from some theoretical disease. You may be self-deprecating in a totally
arrogant
way, the last existentialist on some kind of poetic quest for language, but
if you do
not mainline the whole, that is not
poetry’s place in the current culture.
Somewhere
in Talking in Tranquility, around the
1970s, the late poet Ted
Berrigan,
with whom I studied at Naropa and interviewed and appreciated for
what he
wrote and what he could put into words, said that it’s obvious that the
poet
means nothing in contemporary society. The entire apparatus of
manufactured
reputation-identity and position is pretty much gone. I understand
that
perfectly. You write poems, you want to get them publish, you want people to
read
them, you especially want them to like them. In the past, there were poets
whose
work was good because they wrote it, their name was under it. It would
take a
real discerning eye to be able to tell which poems they’d written with the
intention
of making a major poetical statement and which poems they’d made just
because
the moment brought everything that person knew about making poems to
bear on
some little experience and the writing of some beautiful little poem. Ted
was
talking about Frank O’Hara, and how Frank survived that, could bring an
enormous
amount of feeling to the most ordinary incident and give it “terrific
significance.”
That was in contrast to someone like Milton or Eliot, or even
Whitman
or Ginsberg whose work I would read just to hear what they thought
about
anything. Those poets were writing out of a place where they were the most
important
man in their society. That’s sort of their starting point. Today you have
six
billion average beings speaking the truth via their blogs, their digital
journals,
their
self-produced on-demand limited book runs, selling their own books on
Amazon or
eBay. You have eBooks––and you have Google with its megalomanic
attempt
to digitize every single book ever store housed in any major library. So,
trying to
get somebody to take your work to bed with them or out to a
mountaintop
or on the bus or laundromat or wherever people are when they read
is on a
lot of people’s minds. And, of course, besides all that, the hundreds of
years of
the poet as the archtypic white man shrouded in some kind of book
industry
mystique in any particular society is out the window. Poetry’s place in
this global field is a matter of a universal demotic spirit. Some exhibitionist or
well-connected
or Olympian-attitude jackoff’s always going to get more or her or
his share
of the limelight. People are going to be pissed off or think you’re dead
wrong or
that your poetry is unpure or ugly or asymmetric or too symmetric.
redundant,
too political, not political enough. For me, it was and remains an
incredible
achievement to write a poem. I mean I will never know why I wrote
“When
Skeletons Make Love” or “Coyote Steals The 2000 Presidential Election”
or “The
Rabbi Poems”––only that these poems came to me and through me at the
particular
moments of time that they did. I can pull myself out of wherever I am
and
whoever I’m with and still be there in that place with everything else going
on as if
nothing happened to me at all because for me, poetry requires equal
treatment.
My job is to create that kind of extradimensional
space, as Ted
described
it, right out of the ordinary realm. Most of the people I meet have no
idea what
that means. They may accept ESPN instant replays or CNN footage
replays
or shoot off their guns listening to Rush Limbaugh just to relieve
themselves
of their own ordinary mad burdens, hallucinations, debts or loss or
power.
They may repel their own simple common repressions that makes them
seek the
ordinary feelings and views of others to relate to, but they will not have
any idea
what it is like for a person, a poet, to actually conduct their lives in such
a manner.
RR: Who
and what do you find has sustained you and your work as a poet?
JC: Some
people make deals with the devil. Mine was with poetry. It’s what I
came here
to do. That was very clear to me. I had little choice in it. When the
writing
came I was there, even if didn’t matter. I didn’t come here to make lima
bean
omelets or to remove myself from equality. Poetry is not speculation to me.
Although
it makes judgments on what other people are thinking––where people
are at,
where their collective social acts are headed, their pretensions––it is more
than a
description or an compression of social thinking. Poetry is Vimalakirti
telling
Manjusri “My sickness…will last as long as do the sicknesses of all living
beings.”
A body does crazy things. It causes and transcends bubbles and busts. I
was
sustained by a hairdresser from Florida I met years ago in a youth hostel that
knew of
no poetry, never even finished high school, except he knew all of
Whitman,
by heart. Michigan poet David Cope was the janitor in the college
where
later he would teach Shakespeare and that as well as his long
correspondence
with me, with knowing me, was sustaining. That the Milwaukee
poet
Antler wrote Factory sustained me and
that he and his partner, the ecopoet
Jeff
Poniewaz, remained devoted to one another was a gesture I found a model of
sustainability.
The west coast post-punk Buddhist poet Marc Olmsted with his
three-year
meditation retreat and his shrine room in Oakland with its tankas and
giant
movie horror film posters sustained me. The integrity of the poet Andy
Clausen
sustained me, in his poesy and person. That Lesléa Newman wrote about
Harvey
Milk years before Sean Penn thought about playing him sustained me.
That you
wrote LIT was sustaining to me––the
way you kind of recharged the
entire Norton Anthology of Poetry as though you
were driving an automobile that
stop at
refueling stations in order to give back energy to the grid. There are
hundreds
of examples of sanity, compassion, candor, vivid invention,
groundlessness,
inclusivity, service, wakefulness that gave me a kind of entry to
off-limit
useless procedures that were accidentally left there and accidentally
mislabeled
but not pretend. It wasn’t just that the poets I knew continued writing.
It was
that their poetry and their presence increasingly become a magnet, a store-
house, of
proof where one always changes and one never does. There may be an
ATM in
the lobby, but poetry is a more exact and closer form of economy for me.
It’s bigger
than the book industry, more charming than the United States
Treasury.
Inside a line, a line I was lost in writing, I was completely at peace with
impermanence––the
vastness of impermanence that makes the trillions of dollars
leveraged
against Depression but a speck of dust. Poetry is not something that you
leave at
the jeweler to be cleaned. It is the Gold Scale––the emptiness of all the
Buddha-fields,
wilderness, civilization. As such, I was also sustained by things
that did
not sustain me at all––those things you love in passing or that you never
see in
passing or care for correctly in passing or recognize correctly in passing or
never get
over in passing. And regardless of the tempo these things have over
you––the
unsustaining things––they are also sustaining. You don’t even have to
know how
you will be sustained or if you will be sustained or if there’s a portion
of the
federal bail-out waiting with your name and address on it for you or if you
will have
convictions or if you will advocate those convictions or renounce them
or if you
will simply be troubled by your convictions or see the signs, marks and
ornaments
that underlie all convictions.